Author, Subjects, Keywords

Cited Author

 
 
   » By Author or Editor
 » Browse Author by Alphabet
 » By Journal
 » By Subjects
 » Malaysian Journals
 » By Type
 » By Year
 » By Latest Additions
 
 
   » By Author
 » Top 20 Authors
 » Top 20 Article
 » Top Journal Cited
 » Top Article Cited
 » Journal Citation Statistics
 » Usage Since Sept 2007


 
 
 

Login | Create Account

Does it Pay to Be Good in Developing Countries? The Relationship Between Corporate Social Responsibility and Financial Performance in Malaysia

Ramasamy, Bala, and Ting, Hung Woan, and Yeung, Matthew C.Y., (2007) Does it Pay to Be Good in Developing Countries? The Relationship Between Corporate Social Responsibility and Financial Performance in Malaysia. Asian Academy of Management Journal of Accounting and Finance, 3 (1). pp. 21-36.

[img]
Preview
PDF - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
232Kb

Official URL: http://www.usm.my/journal/aamjaf/vol%203-1-2007/2_bala_(21-36).pdf

Affiliations

China Europe International Business School, Shanghai, China
Nottingham University Business School, Malaysia Campus
Open University of Hong Kong, School of Business, Kowloon, Hong Kong.

Abstract

Corporate social responsibility (CSR) as a common business practice has only recently established a foothold in developing countries. This is evidenced by a lack of literature in the area of CSR among these countries. In Malaysia, for instance, only a third of large businesses can be considered CSR active. The purpose of this paper is to determine if there is a link between CSR performance and financial performance among these large businesses. We compare the monthly average returns of a portfolio of CSR active companies (based on disclosure) against a portfolio of inactive CSR companies as well as against the market, represented by the Kuala Lumpur Stock Exchange Composite Index (KLSE-CI). Both risk unadjusted and risk adjusted returns were utilized in this study. In either case, we do not find strong statistical evidence to show that our CSR portfolio outperforms the market; neither does it beat the non-CSR portfolio. Nevertheless, based on the results obtained by similar studies in the US, UK and Australia, there is reason to believe that CSR active companies may outperform their counterparts when consumers, employees and other stakeholders increase the value they place on socially responsible activities of a firm. Our findings also imply that international investors looking for socially responsible companies in developing companies to invest in need not incur significant opportunity costs when carrying out their investment strategies. Given that developing countries like Malaysia feature strongly in international investment portfolios like the Morgan Stanley International Composite Index (MSCI), socially responsible investors could extend their portfolios internationally without compromising their rate of returns.

Item Type:Journal
Keywords:Corporate social responsibility, business practices, China
Subjects:H Social Sciences, Economics, Sociology
ID Code:6699

Abbott, W. F., & Monsen, R. (1979). On the measurement of corporate social responsibility: Self-reported disclosure as a measure of corporate social involvement. Academy of Management Journal, 22, 501–515.

Abdul Rashid, M. Z., & Ibrahim, S. (2002). Executive and management attitudes towards corporate social responsibility in Malaysia. Corporate Governance, 2(4), 10–16.

ACCA. (2002). The state of corporate environmental reporting in Malaysia. Retrieved from www.accaglobal.com/. . (2003). Environmental reporting guidelines for Malaysian companies. Retrieved from www.accaglobal.com/.

Ahmed, M. (2003). The influence of corporate social responsibility activities of firms on consumer purchasing decisions in Malaysia. MBA dissertation, University of Nottingham.

Anderson, J. C., & Frankel, A. W. (1980). Voluntary social reporting: An ISO-beta portfolio analysis. The Accounting Review, 15(3), 467–479.

Aupperle, K., Carroll, A., & Hatfield, J. (1985). An empirical examination of the relationship between corporate social responsibility and profitability. Academy of Management Journal, 28, 446–463.

Balabanis, G., Philips, H. C., & Lyall, J. (1998). Corporate social responsibility and economic performance in the top british companies: Are they linked? European Business Review, 98(1), 25–44.

Bauer, R., Kees, K., & Otten, R. (2002). International evidence on ethical mutual fund performance and investment style. (Working Paper, January 2002). Retrieved from http://www.socialinvest.org/Areas/research/Moskowitz/2002 _summary.pdf/.

Bowman, E., & Haire, M. (1975). A strategic posture towards CSR. California Management Review, 18(2), 49–58.

Carden, S. D., & Darragh, O. (2004). A halo for angel investors. The McKinsey Quarterly, 1.

Chou Ting-Jui, & Chen Fu-Tang. (2004). Retail pricing strategies in recession economies: The case of Taiwan. Journal of International Marketing, 12(1).

Cochran, P. & Wood, R. (1984). Corporate social responsibility and financial performance. Academy of Management Journal, 27(1), 42–56.

Fabozzi, F. J. (2002). Asset pricing models. In F. J. Fabozzi, & H. M. Markowitz (Eds.). The theory and practice of investment management (65–90). USA: John Wiley.

Goll, I., & Rasheed, A. A. (2002). The effect of environment on the relationship between social responsibility and performance. Academy of Management Proceedings, 2001, A1–A6.

Griffin, J. J., & Mahon, J. F. (1997). The corporate social performance and corporate financial performance debate: Twenty-five years of incomparable research. Business & Society, 36(1), 5–31.

Hillman, A. J., & Keim, G. D. (2001). Shareholder value, stakeholder management, and social issues: What's the bottom line? Strategic Management Journal, 22, 125–139.

Johnson, H. H. (2003). Does it pay to be good? Social responsibility and financial performance. Business Horisons, November–December, 34–40.

Krippendorf, K. (1980). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. London: Sage Publications.

Mallin, C. A., Saadouni, B., & Briston, R. J. (1995). The financial performance of ethical investment funds. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 22(4), 483–496.

McGuire, J. B., Sundgren, A., & Schneeweis, T. (1988). Corporate social responsibility and firm financial performance. Academy of Management Journal, 31(4), 854–872.

McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. (2001). Note – Corporate social responsibility: A theory of the firm perspective. Academy of Management Review, 26(1), 117–127.

Mohammad Jamil, Alwi, K., & Mohamed, R. (2001). Corporate social responsibility disclosure in the annual reports of Malaysian companies: A longitudinal study. (Working Paper Series No. 10/201). Universiti Utara Malaysia.

Moskowitz, M. R. (1972). Choosing socially responsible stocks. Business and Society Review, 1, 71–75.

Preece, D. C., & Filbeck, G. (1999). Family friendly firms: Does it pay to care. Financial Services Review, 8, 47–60.

Preston, L. E. (1978). Analysing corporate social performance: Methods and results. Journal of Contemporary Business, 7, 135–149.

Ramasamy, B., & Hung, W. T. (2004). A comparative analysis of corporate social responsibility awareness: Malaysia and Singapore firms. The Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 13.

Ramasamy, B., & Yeung, M. C. H. (2002). The relationship between exchange rates and stock prices: Implications on capital controls. The Asia Pacific Journal of Economics and Business, 6(2), 46–60.

Rockness, J., Schlachter, P., & Rockness, H. O. (1986). Hazardous waste disposal, corporate disclosure, and financial performance in the chemical industry. Advances in Public Interest Accounting, 1, 167–191.

Sauer, D. A. (1997). The impact of social-responsibility screens on investment performance: Evidence from the Domini 400 social index and domini equity mutual fund. Review of Financial Economics, 6(2), 137–149.

Shaker, A. Z., Oviatt, B. M., & Minyard, K. (1993). Effects of corporate ownership and board structure on corporate social responsibility and financial performance. Academy of Management Proceedings, 336–341.

Social Investment Forum. (2003). 2003 Report on socially responsible investing trends in the United States. Retrieved from http://www.socialinvest.org/.

Soloman, R., & Hansen, K. (1985). It's good business. New York: Atheneum.

Spicer, B. H. (1978). Investors, corporate social performance and information disclosure: An empirical study. Accounting Review, 53, 94–111.

SRI (2003). Kingsway Asia SRI: Cross sectional analysis of Asia for the year 2003. Retrieved from www.socialfunds.com/pdf/KingswaySRI2003.pdf/.

Teoh, H. Y., & Thong, G. (1984). Another look at corporate social responsibility and reporting: An empirical study in a developing country. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 9(2), 189–206.

Tippet, J. (2001). Performance of Australia's ethical funds. The Australian Economic Review, 34(2), 170–178.

Ullmann, A. A. (1985). Data in search of a theory: A critical examination of the relationships among social performance, social disclosure, and economic performance of U.S. firms. Academic of Management Review, 10(3), 540–557.

Vance, S. (1975). Are socially responsible firms good investment risks? Management Review, 64, 18–24.

Zainal Abidin, M. (2000). Implications of the Malaysian experience on future international financial arrangements. ASEAN Economic Bulletin, 17(2), 135–48.

Repository Staff Only: item control page
 
 
 
 
 
 
© Copyright 2007 MyAIS Faculty of Computer Science and Information Technology, University of Malaya – All Rights Reserved. Malaysian Abstracting and Indexing System is powered by EPrints 3 which is developed by the School of Electronics and Computer Science at the University of Southampton. More information and software credits.