Author, Subjects, Keywords

Cited Author

 
 
   » By Author or Editor
 » Browse Author by Alphabet
 » By Journal
 » By Subjects
 » Malaysian Journals
 » By Type
 » By Year
 » By Latest Additions
 
 
   » By Author
 » Top 20 Authors
 » Top 20 Article
 » Top Journal Cited
 » Top Article Cited
 » Journal Citation Statistics
 » Usage Since Sept 2007


 
 
 

Login | Create Account

Gaya Kognitif dan Visualisasi Pelajar Melalui Perisian Multimedia [Congnitive Style and Visualization of Students Through Multimedia Software]

Ahmad Rizal Madar, and Yahya Buntat, (2008) Gaya Kognitif dan Visualisasi Pelajar Melalui Perisian Multimedia [Congnitive Style and Visualization of Students Through Multimedia Software]. Masalah Pendidikan, 31 (1). pp. 181-192. ISSN 0126-5024

[img]
Preview
PDF - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
470Kb

Affiliations

Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia, Faculty of Technical Education
Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Faculty of Education, Dept.of Technical and Vocational Education

Abstract

Cognitive style refers to the preferred way an individual processes information. Cognitive style is usually described as a personality dimension which influences attitudes, values, and social interaction. One individual has a different cognitive style and visualization capability from another because individuals differ in the capability to see objects and to think in two or three dimensions and visualize changes in the configuration of objects manipulated in the mind. Hence this article investigates the distinction of cognitive style and visualization of technical students through the use of multimedia technology and animation as courseware. This article also discusses how the educational software used in various forms such as images will allow anything to be understood and reduce complexity in the system software that exists, especially in the mindset to give students high power of imagery or visualization capabilities to perform in education.

Item Type:Journal
Keywords:Information processing, Cogbitive style, Personality, Attitudes
Subjects:L Education
ID Code:7435

Azizi Yahaya, Asmah Suboh, Zurihanmi Zakariya, & Fawziah Yahya. (2005). Aplikasi kognitif dalam pendidikan. Kuala Lumpur: PTS Professional.

Alomyan, H. (2004). Individual differences and their implications in web-based learning design. Australian Computer in Education Conference- ACEC 2004.Adelaide, Australia.

Alomyam, H. (2008). An investigation of the effect of cognitive style and different presentation strategies on student's information retrieval in a web-based learning environment. Australian Computer in Education Conference- ACEC 2004. Adelaide, Australia.

Baharuddin Aris. (2001). Pendekatan alternatif multimedia dalam pengajaran dan pembelajaran matematik: Pengalaman di UTM. Skudai: Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.

Cano, J., & Metzger, S. (1995). The relationship between learning style and levels of cognition of instruction of horticulture teachers. Journal of Agricultural Education, 36, 2.

Chance, P. (2006). Learning and behavior (5th ed.). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.

Chen, S. Y. (2005). A flexible interface design for web directories to accommodate different cognitive styles. Journal Of The American Society For Information Science And Technology, 56(1), 70-83.

Clark, J. M., & Paivio, A. (1991). Dual coding theory and education. Educational Psychology Review, 3(3), 149-170.

Ford, N., & Chen, S. Y. (2001). Matching/mismatching revisited: An empirical study of learning and teaching style. British Journal Of Education Technology,32(1), 5-22.

Gagne, R. M. (1985). The conditions of learning. New York: Holt.

Guilford, J. P. (1982). Cognitive psychology ambiguities: Some suggested remedies.Psychological Review, 89, 48-59.

Jamalludin & Zaidatun. (2000).Pengenalan kepada multimedia Kuala Lumpur:Venton.

Jonassen, D. H., & Hannum, W. H. (1987). Research-based principles for designing computer software. Educational Technology, 12, 7-14.

Kamus Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka (2007). Edisi Ketiga. Kuala Lumpur. Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.

Knight, M. (2000). System and software visualization. Durham, UK: World Scientific.

Matlin, M. W. (2005). Cognition (6th ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

Messick, S. (Ed.) (1976). Individuality in learning. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Mohd Daud Hamzah. (2002). Kertas ceramah bengkel peningkatan kualiti kaedah pengajaran pembelajaran subjek matematik dan pendidikan Islam bagi program matrikulasi Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. Kuala Lumpur. 5-8 Ogos, 2002.

Norshahadah Abdul Rahman. (2005). Amalan rekabentuk bahan pembelajaran secara elektronik-perisian multimedia di kalangan pelajar sarjana pendidikan teknikal di KUiTTHO. Kolej Universiti Teknologi Tun Hussein Onn.

Paivio, A. (1986). Mental representations:A dual Approach Dlm. Eun-Mi Yang & T.Andre, Spatial ability and the impact of visualization/animation on learning electrochemistry. Journal of Science Education, 25, 329 -349.

Parkinson, A., & Redmond, J. A. (2002). The impact of cognitive styles and educational computer environments on learning performance. Dublin, Ireland: Trinity College, Dept of Computer Science.

Riding, R., & Rayner, S. R.(2000). Cognitive style and learning strategies. London: Fulton.

Skinner, B. F. (1985). Cognitive science and behaviourism. British Journal of Psychology, 76, 291-301.Witkin, H. A., Moore, C. A., Goodenough, D. R., & Cox, P. W. (1971). A manual forthe group embedded figures test. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychology Press.

Yuwaldi Away. (2002). Rekabentuk berbantukan komputer (CAD). Kuala Lumpur: Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.

Repository Staff Only: item control page
 
 
 
 
 
 
© Copyright 2007 MyAIS Faculty of Computer Science and Information Technology, University of Malaya – All Rights Reserved. Malaysian Abstracting and Indexing System is powered by EPrints 3 which is developed by the School of Electronics and Computer Science at the University of Southampton. More information and software credits.