Author, Subjects, Keywords

Cited Author

 

 
   » By Author or Editor
 » Browse Author by Alphabet
 » By Journal
 » By Subjects
 » Malaysian Journals
 » By Type
 » By Year
 » By Latest Additions
 
 
   » By Author
 » Top 20 Authors
 » Top 20 Article
 » Top Journal Cited
 » Top Article Cited
 » Journal Citation Statistics
 » Usage Since Sept 2007


 
 
 

Login | Create Account

Kedudukan Bayyinah, Syahadah dan Qarinah dalam Penggubalan Undang-Undang Keterangan Islam diMalaysia

Ruzman Md. Noor, (2008) Kedudukan Bayyinah, Syahadah dan Qarinah dalam Penggubalan Undang-Undang Keterangan Islam diMalaysia. Jurnal Syariah, 16 (2). pp. 345-366. ISSN 0128 - 6730

[img]
Preview
PDF - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
333Kb

Affiliations

University of Malaya. Academy of Islamic Studies. Dept. of Syariah Law

Abstract

This article tries to analyze the methodology of promulgation of the Islamic Law of Evidence in Malaysia. It focuses on the principles of bayyinah, syahadah and qarinah. Since the structure of the law originates from the Evidence Act 1950, which is mainly based on the principles of evidence in English common law, several modifications and insertions have to be performed through the methodology of Islamic Jurisprudence or Usul al-Fiqh. Various suggestions have been put forward in this article to ensure that the position of bayyinah, syahadah and qarinah are correctly placed in the respective law.

Item Type:Journal
Keywords:bayyinah, shahadah, qarinah, evidence, witness, Islamic law, Law of Evidence, Malaysia
Subjects:K Law
B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion, Islam
ID Code:7564

Abd al-Karim Zaydan, Nizam al-Qada’, Baghdad: Maktabat al-Ayn.

Ahmad Fathi Bahnasi (1964), al-Qisas fi al-Fiqh al-Islami, Kaherah: al-Syarikah al-`Arabiyyah.

Ahmad Ibrahim (1992), “Conflict Between Shariah Law and Common Law: Problem and Solution”, dalam Seminar on Shariah and Common Law in Malaysia , IIUM: Law Faculty

Ahmad Ibrahim (1995), “Perkembangan Terkini Undang-undang Islam di Malaysia”, dalam Monir Yaacob (ed.), Undang–undang Keterangan dan Prosedur di Mahkamah, Kuala Lumpur: IKIM.

Ahmad Ibrahim (1996), “Perkembangan Terkini Undang-undang Keterangan Mahkamah Syariah”, dalam Bengkel Kebangsaan Undang-undang Keterangan Mahkamah di Syariah, Bangi: Fakulti Pengajian Islam UKM.

Al-Fayyumi (1926), al-Misbah al-Munir, Al-Matba`at al-Amiriyyah, jil. 1.

Al-Mawdudi (1990), Islamic Law And Constitution, Trans. Kurshid Ahmad, Lahore: Islamic Pub. Ltd.

Al-Ramli (1938), Nihayat al-Muhtaj, Mesir: Mustafa al-Babi al-Halabi, jil. 8.

Al-San`ani (1996), Subul al-Salam, Beirut: Dar al-Ma`rifah, jil. 4.

Al-Shafi`i(1968), Al-Umm, t.t, t.tp, Bab Al-Syahadat, jil. 7.

Al-Shirbini (1997), Mughni al-Muhtaj, Beirut: Dar al-Ma`rifah, jil. 4.

Al-Suyuti (1979), al-Asybah wa al-Naza’ir, Beirut: Dar al-Kutub al-`Ilmiyyah.

Amin Ahsan Islahi (1979), Islamic Law: Concept and Codification, Lahore:Islamic Pub. Ltd.

Badran Abu al-`Aynayn Badran (t.t.), Usul al-Fiqh al-Islami, Iskandariah: Mu’assasah Shabab al-Jami`at.

Donald L. Horowitz (1994), “The Qur’an and The Common Law: Islamic Law Reform and The Theory of Legal Change”, dalam The American Journal of Comparative Law, xlii (2&3).

Harith Sulayman al-Faruqi (1995), al-Mu` jam al-Qanuni, Beirut: Maktabah Lubnan.

Ibn Faris (1969), Mu` jam al-Maqayis al-Lughat, Mesir: Maktabah al-Babi al-Halabi, jil. 1.

Ibn Manzur (1956), Lisan al-`Arab, Beirut: Dar al-Sadir, jil. 3, h. 133;

Al-Amidi (1968), Al-Ihkam fi Usul al-Ahkam, Mesir: Maktabah wa Matba`ah `Ali Sabih, jil. 3.

Ibn Qayyim al-Jawziyyah (1961), al-Turuq al-Hukmiyyah fi Siyasah al-Syar`iyyah, Kaherah: Mu’assasat al-`Arabiyyah.

James Stephen (1936), A Digest of The Law of Evidence, Mac Millan, London.

Kamus Besar Arab-Melayu Dewan (2006), Kuala Lumpur: DBP.

Mahmud Saedon (1995), “Undang-undang Keterangan di Mahkamah Syariah”, dalam Monir Yaacob (1995) (ed.), Undang –undang Keterangan dan Prosedur di Mahkamah, Kuala Lumpur: IKIM.

Maria Luisa Seda-Poulin (1993), “Islamization and Legal Reform in Malaysia: The Hudud Controversy of 1992”, dalam South East Asian Affairs,Singapore: ASEAS.

Mohd. Saleh Hj. Ahmad (2005), “al-Bayyinah dan Beban Pembuktian: Teori dan Amalan di Mahkamah Syariah”, dalam Risalah Ahkam, Petaling Jaya: IMAP.

Muhammad Abu Zahrah (1958), Usul al-Fiqh, Qaherah: Dar al-Fikr al-`Arabi.

Muhammad Sulayman `Abd Allah al-Asyqar (1997), al-Wadih fi Usul al-Fiqh, Jordan:Dar al-Nafa’is.

Norman Anderson (1976), Law Reform in Muslim World, University of London: The Athlone Press.

Wael Hallaq, “Was The Gate of Ijtihad Close”, dalam Ian Edge (ed.)(1996), Islamic Law And Legal Theory, Singapore: Darthmouth

Imran Ahsan Khan Nyazee (1994), Theories of Islamic Law, Islamabad: IIIT, Islamic Research Institute.

Wahbah al-Zuhayli (1969), Al-Wasit fi Usul al-Fiqh, Damsyik: al-Matba`ah al-`Ilmiyyah.

Wahbah al-Zuhayli (1989), al-Fiqh al-Islami wa Adillatuhu, Damsyik: Dar al- Fikr, jil. 6. Dalam Perkara Permohonan Perisytiharan Status Agama Si Mati Nyonya Tahir, JHXXI/II Jun 2006, 221.

Mat Sharie Yaakob lwn. Che Mas Abdullah lwn., JHXIX/I, Feb. 2005, 109.

Pengesahan Hibah Siti Noor Aseera Awang, JHXXIII/I, Mac 2007, 119, seksyen 83(3).

Rogayah Ismail lwn. Abd. Razak Sulong, JHXX/II, Nov. 2005, 306.

Repository Staff Only: item control page