Author, Subjects, Keywords

Cited Author

 
 
   » By Author or Editor
 » Browse Author by Alphabet
 » By Journal
 » By Subjects
 » By Affiliations
 » Malaysian Journals
 » By Type
 » By Year
 » By Latest Additions
 
 
   » By Author
 » Top 20 Authors
 » Top 20 Article
 » Top Journal Cited
 » Top Article Cited
 » Journal Citation Statistics
 » Usage Since Sept 2007


 
 
 

Login | Create Account

Cabaran Globalisasi: Strategi Ekonomi Upah Tinggi

Zulkifly Osman, and Mohd Azlan Shah Zaidi, (2002) Cabaran Globalisasi: Strategi Ekonomi Upah Tinggi. Jurnal Ekonomi Malaysia, 36 . pp. 3-17. ISSN 01261962

Full text not available from this repository.

Affiliations

Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia. Fakulti Ekonomi. Jabatan Analisis Ekonomi dan Dasar Awam.
Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia. Fakulti Ekonomi. Jabatan Analisis Ekonomi dan Dasar Awam.

Abstract

Dalam model ekonomi upah tinggi, upah tidak harus dianggap sebagai faktor kos semata-mata. Sebaliknya, ia juga harus dianggap sebagai faktor pendapatan kepada pekerja. Ini membawa maksud bahawa jika upah tinggi, keselesaan hidup pekerja akan meningkat dan ia boleh menyumbang kepada peningkatan daya usaha dan seterusnya produktiviti pekerja. Fenomena ini sekali gus dapat meningkatkan keuntungan majikan. Namun, persoalannya ialah adakah upah yang menyebabkan produktiviti meningkat atau kerana produktiviti tinggi maka upah tinggi. Dengan menggunakan ujian penyebab Granger (1969) dan ujian penyebab versi Toda dan Yamamoto (1995), rencana kajian dibuat untuk melihat hubungan timbal balik antara kedua-dua pembolehubah-pembolehubah berkenaan. Hasilnya didapati bahawa kemungkinan kewujudan fenomena ekonomi upah tinggi amat sukar untuk ditolak. Ertinya, kenaikan upah akan disusuli dengan peningkatan produktiviti. Ini merupakan petanda baik bagi Malaysia dan segi strategi dalam menghadapi saingan pasaran global akibat hakisan kelebihan kos buruh murah.

Item Type:Journal
Keywords:Upah, produktiviti, buruh, arah penyebab
Subjects:H Social Sciences, Economics, Sociology
ID Code:8020

1. Ackerloff, G. A. 1984. Gift exchange and efficiency wages: four views. American Economic Review 74 (May): 78-83.

2. Dickens W., Lawrence Katz & Kevin Lang. 1986. Are efficiency wages efficient? NBER Working Paper #1935 (June).

3. Dickey, D. A. & W. A. Fuller. 1979. Distribution of the Estimators for Autoregressive Time Series with a Unit Root. Journal of the American Statistical Association 74: 427-431.

4. Dolado, J. J. & H. Lutkepohl. 1996. Making Wald Tests Work for Cointegrated VAR System. Econometric Reviews, forthcoming.

5. Dunlop, J. T. (ed.) 1966. The Theory of Wage Determination. London: Macmillan.

6. Eaton C. & William D. White. 1983. The economy of high wages: an agency problem. Economica 50 (May): 175-181.

7. Engle, Robert F. & C. W. J. Granger. 1987. Co-integration and error correction: Representation, estimation, and testing. Econometrica 55: 251-276.

8. Granger, C. W. J. 1969. Investigating causal relations by econometric model and cross spectral methods. Econometrica July: 9-50.

9. Granger, C. W. J. 1988. Some recent development in a concept of causality. Journal of Econometrics 39: 199-211.

10. Granger, C. W. J. & P. Newbold. 1974. Spurious regressions in econometrics. Journal of Econometrics 2: 111-120.

11. Hicks, J. R. 1932. The Theory of Wages. New York: Macmillan.

12. Ishak Shari & Zulkifly Osman. 1988. Strategi perindustrian: Kesan terhadap penyerapan buruh, struktur upah dan pendapatan di sektor perkilangan. Dlm. Chamhuri Siwar & Mohd. Haflah Piei, (eds.). Dasar dan Strategi Pembasmian Kemiskinan. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.

13. Jabatan Perangkaan Malaysia. 1999. Perangkaan Ekonomi Malaysia — Siri Masa. Kuala Lumpur: Jabatan Perangkaan Malaysia.

14. Katz, Lawrence F. 1986. Efficiency Wage Theories: A partial evaluation. NBER Working Paper #1906 (April).

15. Kementerian Kewangan Malaysia. 1987. Laporan Ekonomi 1987/88. Kuala Lumpur. Jabatan Percetakan Negara.

16. Krueger, A. B. & Lawrence H. Summers. 1988. Efficiency wages and interindustry wage structure. Econometrica 5: 259-293.

17. Lester, R. 1946. Shortcomings of marginal analysis for wage employment problems. American Econ. Review 36 (March).

18. Machlup, F. 1946. Marginal analysis and empirical research. American Econ. Review 36 (March).

19. MacKinnon, J. G. 1991. Critical values of cointegration tests. Dlm. R. F. Engle & C. W. J. Granger, (eds.), Long run economic relationships: Readings in Cointegration. New York: Oxford University Press.

20. Malaysia. 1996. Rancangan Malaysia Ketujuh 1996-2000. Kuala Lumpur: Percetakan Nasional Malaysia Bhd.

21. Mansor Jusoh & Chew Yuet Fah. 1998. Upah agregat dan produktiviti buruh di Malaysia: Penganggaran model penentuan upah dengan pendekatan kointegrasi. Jurnal Ekonomi Malaysia 32.

22. Perlman, R. 1969. Labor Theory. New York: John Wiley & Sons. Inc.

23. Philips, P. C. B. & P. Perron. 1988. Testing for a Unit Root in Time Series Regression. Biometrika 75(2): 335-346.

24. Rambaldi, A. N. & Doran H. E. 1996. Testing for Granger non-causality in cointegrated systems made easy. Working Papers in Econometrics and Applied Statistics No. 88. Department of Econometrics. The University of New England.

25. Rees, Albert. 1973. The Economics of Work and Pay. New York: Harper & Row.

26. Toda, H. Y. & T. Yamamoto. 1995. Statistical inference in vectors auto regressions with possibly integrated process. Journal of Econometrics 66: 225-250.

27. Toda, H. Y. & P. C. B. Phillips. 1993. Vectors auto regressions and causality. Econometrica 1367-1393.

Repository Staff Only: item control page
 
 
 
 
 
   
© Copyright 2007 MyAIS Faculty of Computer Science and Information Technology, University of Malaya – All Rights Reserved. Malaysian Abstracting and Indexing System is powered by EPrints 3 which is developed by the School of Electronics and Computer Science at the University of Southampton. More information and software credits.