Author, Subjects, Keywords

Cited Author

 

 
   » By Author or Editor
 » Browse Author by Alphabet
 » By Journal
 » By Subjects
 » Malaysian Journals
 » By Type
 » By Year
 » By Latest Additions
 
 
   » By Author
 » Top 20 Authors
 » Top 20 Article
 » Top Journal Cited
 » Top Article Cited
 » Journal Citation Statistics
 » Usage Since Sept 2007


 
 
 

Login | Create Account

Gaya Pembelajaran Komputer Guru Pelatih Kursus Perguruan Lepas Ijazah Maktab Perguruan (Computer Learning Styles of Teacher Trainees From Teachers College)

Norazah Mohd Nordin, and Shaari Osman, (2006) Gaya Pembelajaran Komputer Guru Pelatih Kursus Perguruan Lepas Ijazah Maktab Perguruan (Computer Learning Styles of Teacher Trainees From Teachers College). Jurnal Pendidikan (UKM), 30 . ISSN 01266020

[img]MS Word
45Kb

Official URL: http://www.ukm.my/jurfpend

Affiliations

Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia. Faculty of Education
Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia. Faculty of Education

Abstract

ABSTRACT: The purpose of this study was to determine the level of the preferred learning styles in the process of learning the applications of computer among post graduate teacher trainees in the Klang Valley as a case study. The main focus of the study was to determine the level of six preferred learning styles, which are audio, visual,tactile, kinestatic, group and individual in the process of learning the applications of computer. This study also focuses on the relationships between preferred learning styles with gender and options. This study was conducted upon 338 post graduate teacher trainees in colleges situated in the Klang Valley by using stratified sampling technique. A set of questionnaires was used to collect data and then analyzed by using descriptive and inferential statistics. In general, the study has shown that the level of the preferred learning styles in groups and kinestatic were high, and others were average. There was statistically significant relationship between the preferred learning styles in groups with gender. Other aspects of the preferred learning styles did not show any difference with respect to gender and options.


ABSTRAK: Kajian ini bertujuan untuk meninjau tahap kecenderungan gaya pembelajaran dalam proses pembelajaran komputer di kalangan guru pelatih Kursus Perguruan Lepas Ijazah (KPLI), maktab-maktab perguruan di Lembah Klang dengan menggunakan kaedah tinjauan. Tumpuan kajian ialah terhadap enam kecenderungan gaya pembelajaran iaitu audio, visual, tactile, kinestatik, berkumpulan dan individu serta hubungannya dengan jantina dan opsyen. Kajian ini dijalankan terhadap 338 orang guru pelatih yang dipilih secara rawak berstrata dan satu set soal selidik digunakan sebagai instrumen kajian bagi memungut data. Data yang diperolehi dianalisis menggunakan statistik deskriptif dan inferensi bagi mentafsir data dan untuk menjawab soalan-soalan kajian. Dapatan kajian menunjukkan bahawa tahap aspek kecenderungan gaya pembelajaran adalah tinggi bagi gaya berkumpulan dan gaya kinestatik, manakala gaya pembelajaran audio, visual, tactile, dan individu adalah sederhana. Terdapat juga hubungan yang signifikan antara tahap gaya pembelajaran berkumpulan dengan jantina. Lain-lain gaya pembelajaran tidak menunjukkan perbezaan disebabkan faktor jantina dan opsyen dalam proses pembelajaran komputer.

Item Type:Journal
Keywords:Learning styles, Teacher trainees, Selagor, Malaysia
Subjects:L Education
ID Code:8043

DeBello, T.C. 1990. Comparison of eleven major learning styles model: Variables, appropriete populations, validity of instrumentation, and resesrch behind them. Journal of Reading, Writing, and Learning Disabilities International 6(3): 203-222

Dunn, R & Dunn, K. 1978. Teaching students throught their individual learning styles: A practical approach. New Jersey Prentice Hill.

Grasha, A.F., & Reichmann, S.W. 1974. A rasional approach to developing and assessing the construct validity of a student learning style scale instrument. Journal of Psycology 87: 213-223

Hayes, J., & Allinson, C.W. 1996. The implication of learning styles for training and development: A discussion of the matching hypotheses. British Journal of Management 68: 301-308.

Knowles, M. S. & Associates. 1984. Andragogy in action. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Loo, R. 2002. The distribution of learning styles and types for hard and soft business major. Educational Psychology 22(3): 350-360.

Mohammad Zailani Jaya. 2001. Kecenderungan gaya pembelajaran guru pelatih tahun 2, maktab-maktab perguruan Sarawak. Penyelidikan Peringkat Sarjana UKM.

Reid, J.M. 1987. The perceptual learning styles preferences og ESL students. TESOL Quarterly 21(1): 87-109.

Reid, J.M (Ed.). 1995. Learning styles in the ESL/EFL classroom. Boston, MA: Heinle & Heinle Publishers.

Reiff, J. C. 1992. Learning styles. Washington DC: National Education Association.

Rhonda, D. F .2003. Effects of traditional versus learning-styles instructional methods on midle school students. The Journal of Educational Research, September/October 2003, 97(1):42-51.

Riding, R., & Rayner, S. (Eds.). 1998. Cognitive styles and learning strategies: Understanding style differences in learning and behaviour. London: David Fulton Publishers

Roger, A. 2002. Dlm. Harrison et al. 2002. Supporting lifelong learning volume I: perspectine on learning. London: Routledge

Falmer Sternberg, R.J. 2001. Epilogue: Another mysterious affair at styles. Dlm R.J Sternberg & L.F. Zhang (Eds.), Perspectives on thinking, learning, and cognitive styles (249¬252). NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Repository Staff Only: item control page