Author, Subjects, Keywords

Cited Author

 
 
   » By Author or Editor
 » Browse Author by Alphabet
 » By Journal
 » By Subjects
 » Malaysian Journals
 » By Type
 » By Year
 » By Latest Additions
 
 
   » By Author
 » Top 20 Authors
 » Top 20 Article
 » Top Journal Cited
 » Top Article Cited
 » Journal Citation Statistics
 » Usage Since Sept 2007


 
 
 

Login | Create Account

Pincang Laku Kepimpinan Pengetua Menurut Perspektif Guru: Satu Kajian Kes

Abdul Ghani Abdullah, and Abd Rahman Abd Aziz, and Tang, Keow Ngang , (2008) Pincang Laku Kepimpinan Pengetua Menurut Perspektif Guru: Satu Kajian Kes. Jurnal Pendidikan (UKM), 33 . pp. 47-60. ISSN 01266020

[img]MS Word
95Kb

Official URL: http://www.ukm.my/jurfpend

Affiliations

Universiti Sains Malaysia . School of Educational Studies
Universiti Sains Malaysia . School of Educational Studies
Universiti Sains Malaysia . School of Educational Studies

Abstract

ABSTRAK: Kajian ini bertujuan untuk membekalkan pengetahuan secara konstruktif dan komprehensif tentang pincang laku kepimpinan pengetua dan kesan distruktif pincang laku tersebut kepada guru dari segi emosi dan fizikal dalam jangka masa pendek dan panjang menurut pandangan dan pengalaman guru. Sehubungan itu pendekatan interaksi simbolik digunakan bagi mengkaji 10 orang guru yang dipercayai menjadi mangsa pincang laku kepimpinan pengetua di salah sebuah sekolah yang telah dikenal pasti. Dapatan kajian telah merumuskan huraian guru tentang tindakan yang dipersepsi sebagai pincang laku kepimpinan pengetua seterusnya kesan pincang laku terhadap prestasi mereka di dalam bilik darjah. Implikasi kajian kepada bakal pentadbir dan implikasi terhadap kajian lanjutan turut dibincangkan.

ABSTRACT : The aim of this study is to provide knowledge constructively and comprehensively of teacher perspectives of principals’ leadership misbehavior (mistreatment) and its destructive effects emotionally and physically on teachers. Symbolic interaction approach was used to study 10 teachers who believed they were subjected to short and long term mistreatment from their school principal. The results briefly discuss the perception of principals’ leadership misbehavior from the perspective of teachers and its effects on teachers’ performance in classroom. Implication of the study for future administrators and further research is discussed.

Item Type:Journal
Additional Information:Title translayion: Principals’ Leadership Misbehavior (Mistreatment) According To Teachers’ Perspective: A Case Study)
Keywords:Misbehaviour of principals, Headteachers, Headmasters, Teacher's performance, effect on
Subjects:L Education
ID Code:8361

Adams, B. 1988. Leader behavior of principals and its effect on teacher burnout. Unpub¬lished dissertation, University of Wisconsin-Madison.

Anderson, L. M., & Pearson, C. M. 1999. Tit for tat?: The spirling effect of incivility in the workforce. Academy of Management Review 24(3), 452-471.

Ashforth, B. 1994. Petry tryranny in organizations. Human Relations 47(7), 755-778.

Baron, A., & Neuman, H. 1996. Workplace violence and workplace aggression: Evidence on their relative frequency and potential causes. Aggressive Behavior 22: 161-173

Bassman, S. 1992. Abuse in the workplace: Management remedies and bottom line impact. New York: Quorum.

Bjorkvist, K., Osterman, K., & Hjelt-Back, M. 1994. Aggression among university employees. Aggressive Behavior 20: 173-184.

Blasé, J. 1991. Some negative effects of principals’ control oriented and protective political behavior. American Educational Research Journal 27(4): 725-753.

Blasé, J., & Blasé, J. 2001. Breaking the silence: Overcoming the problem of principal mistreatment of teachers. Thousand Oak, CA: Corwin Press.

Blumer, H. 1969. Symbolic interactionism: Perspective and method. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Charmaz, K. 2000. Grounded theory: Objectivist and contructivist methods. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 509-535). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Deihl, B. 1993. The relationship between teachers’ coping resources, feelings of stress, and perceptions of the power tactics employed by the administration. Unpublished dissertation, Georgia State University, Atlanta.

Davenpotr, N., Schwartz, D., & Elliot, P. 1999. Mobbing: Emotional abuse in the Ameri-can Workplace. Ames, IA: Civil Society Publishing.

Fullan, M. 2001. What’s worth fighting for in the principalship? New York: Teachers College Press.

Harlos, P., & Pinder, C. 2000. Emotion and injustice in the workplace. In S. Fineman (Ed.), Emotion in organizations (2nd ed., pp. 255-276). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Keashly, L. 1998. Emotional abuse in the workplace: Conceptual and empirical issues. Journal of Emotional Abuse, 1(1): 85-117.

Leyman, H. 1990. Mobbing and psychological terror at workplace. Violence and Victims 5(2), 119-126.

Meltzer, N., Petras, W., & Reynolds, T. 1975. Symbolic interactionism: Genesis, variet-ies and criticism. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

Namie, G., & Namie, R. 2000. The bully at work: What you can do to stop the hurt and reclaim your dignity on the job. Naperville, IL: Sourcebooks.

Ryan, K. D., & Oestreich, D. K. 1991. Driving fear out of the workplace: How to overcome the invisible barriers to quality, productivity, and innovation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Schwandt, A. 1994. Constructivist, interpretivist approaches to human inquiry. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 509¬535). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Senge, P. 2000. Schools that learn: A fifth discipline fieldbook for educators, parents, and everyone who cares abour education. New York: Doubleday.

Sergiovanni, T.2001. Leadership for the schoolhouse: How is it different? San Francisco: Jossey Bass.

Taylor, J., & Bogdan, R. 1998. Introduction to qualitative methods: A guidebook and resource (3rd ed). New York: Wiley.

Repository Staff Only: item control page
 
 
 
 
 
 
© Copyright 2007 MyAIS Faculty of Computer Science and Information Technology, University of Malaya – All Rights Reserved. Malaysian Abstracting and Indexing System is powered by EPrints 3 which is developed by the School of Electronics and Computer Science at the University of Southampton. More information and software credits.