Author, Subjects, Keywords

Cited Author

 

 
   » By Author or Editor
 » Browse Author by Alphabet
 » By Journal
 » By Subjects
 » Malaysian Journals
 » By Type
 » By Year
 » By Latest Additions
 
 
   » By Author
 » Top 20 Authors
 » Top 20 Article
 » Top Journal Cited
 » Top Article Cited
 » Journal Citation Statistics
 » Usage Since Sept 2007


 
 
 

Login | Create Account

Open Access Initiatives in Academic Libraries: Challenge to the User

Kaur, Kiran, and Chia, Yip Ping, (2009) Open Access Initiatives in Academic Libraries: Challenge to the User. In: World Library and Information Congress: 75Tth IFLA General Conference and Council, 23-27 August 2009,, Milan, Italy.

[img]
Preview
PDF - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
130Kb

Official URL: http://www.ifla.org/annual-conference/ifla75/index.htm

Affiliations

University of Malaya. Faculty of Computer Science & Information Technology
Universiti Tunku Abdul Rahman. Library

Abstract

In developing countries, academic librarians are experimenting with open source software in the establishment of institutional repository (IR) systems in local libraries, using either Greenstone, Fedora, DSpace or EPrints. These libraries are vouching on the successful implementation in the local library set up, so that it can then be up-scaled to institution-wide application through campus networks or intranet. A healthy uptake of the institution-wide set up may then open up to wider audiences with the availability of dedicated information infrastructure combined with broadband connectivity and national educational policies. In Malaysia the pioneers to open access initiatives are the academic libraries, specifically the university libraries. These libraries have initiated innovative services to their researchers by creating open access institutional repositories for wide dissemination of scholarly literature by their own community members. This study explores an extremely valuable electronic service in the academic library, i.e.
the open access initiatives by Malaysian university libraries. Specifically it aims to investigate the extent of open access adoption; the types of initiatives taken and the efficiency of these initiatives based on user perspectives. A system, no matter how technically sophisticated, is only as good as the users of the system judges it to be. Therefore, this study also attempted to investigate the perception of users of open access initiatives towards the usability and efficiency of these systems to help users search and access useful resources with minimal effort. The investigation is extended to all public and private universities in Malaysia with open access institutional repositories (IR). An initial framework for investigation was built based on the literature and this was tested using the data collected from reviewing the various open access journal and IR. User perception about the open access initiatives is based on survey and interviews with selective users from each university. The results of this study can be used to improve user services, especially in electronic medium for wider dissemination of open access initiatives and increase participation of user communities. Some of the major challenges faced by the users are ease of access, ease of searching the relevant content, updated content and online help support. Users deem these issues to be pertinent when providing access to institutional repositories. There is also much demand on help from information professionals via electronic communication channels. As a developing country, Malaysia has a long way to go, but the beginning is promising and it is hoped by studies such as this the user perspective may be a contributing factor to the establishment of open access initiatives.

Item Type:Conference or Workshop Item (Paper)
Subjects:Z Bibliography. Library Science. Information Science
ID Code:8640

Abrizah, A., Kiran, K., Edzan, N.N. and Zainab A.N. 2007. Making Malaysian research available through publishing in Open Access E-journals and E-prints. Paper presented at the Persidangan Kebangsaan Ilmiah MAPIM 2007, Johor Baharu, Johore, 9-11 January 2007. 15p.

Abrizah, A. 2009. Faculty’s awareness, self-archiving experience and contribution to university’s Institutional repository. Malaysian Journal of Library and Information Science, Vol.14, no.2.(In Press).

Aschenbrenner, A., Blanke, T., Hedges, M., & Flanders , D. 2008. The Future of Repositories? Patterns for (Cross-)Repository Architectures, D-Lib, 14 (11/12). Available at ; http://www.dlib.org/dlib/november08/aschenbrenner/11aschenbrenner.html.

Association of Research Libraries. 2004. Framing the issue: open access. Available at: www.arl.org/bm-doc/ framing-issue-may04.pdf.

Berlin Declaration on OA Knowledge, 2003 . Berlin Declaration on Open Access to Knowledge in the Sciences and Humanities. Available at: www. zim.mpg.de/openaccessberlin/

berlin_declaration.pdf.

Bjork, B.. 2004. Open access to scientific publications: An analysis of the barriers to change. Information Research, Vol. 9, no.2. Available at http://informationr.net/ir/9-2/paper170.html.

Budapest Open Access Initiative, 2002. Budapest Open Access Initiative. (2002) Available at:http://www.soros.org/openaccess/read.shtml.

Callan, P. 2004. The development and implementation of a university-wide self archiving policy at Queensland University of Technology: Insights from the Front Line. In Proc. SPARC IR04: Institutional repositories: The Next Stage. Washington D.C: SPARC.

Chan, L. 2004. Supporting and enhancing scholarship in the digital age: the role of open-access institutional repositories. Canadian Journal of Communication, Vol.29: 277-300.

Crow, R. 2002. The Case for Institutional Repositories: A SPARC Position Paper. Available at http://www.arl.org/sparc/IR/ir.html.

Davis, P.M. and M.L.J. Conolly. 2007. Institutional Repositories: Evaluating the reasons for nonuse of Cornell's installation of Dspace". D-Lib Magazine, Vol.13, no.3. Available at : http://www.dlib.org/dlib/march07/davis/03davis.html.

Dillon, C. 2008. More access, more impact: updates on the open access movement from peer Suber and Jonathan Band. Virginia Libraries, April/June.

Directory of Open Access Repositories. (http://www.opendoar.org).

Foster, N. F., and Gibbons, S. 2005. Understanding faculty to improve content recruitment for institutional repositories. D-Lib 11(1). Available at: http://www.dlib.org/dlib/january05/foster/01foster.html.

Gandel, P., Katz, R. and Metros, S. 2004. The weariness of the flesh: Reflections on the life of the mind in an era of abundance. Educause Review, Vol. 39, no.2: 40-51. Available at: http://www.educause.edu/apps/er/erm04/erm042.asp.

Ghosh, S.B. and Anup K. D. 2007. Open Access and Institutional Repositories-A developing country perspective: a case study of India. IFLA Journal, Vol. 33, no.3: 229-250.

Gideon, E.C. 2008. Open access initiative and the developing world . African Journal of Library, Archives and Information Science, Vol. 18, no.2.

Harnad, S., et al., 2003. Mandated RAE CVs Linked to University ePrint Archives: Enhancing UK Research Impact and Assessment. Ariadne, 35 ( March/April). Available at:

http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue35/harnad/.

Helen, H. 2006. Digital preservation in the context of institutional repositories. Program: Electronic Library And Information Systems,Vol. 40, no.3: 232-243.

Johnson, R. 2002. Institutional repositories: partnering with faculty to enhance scholarly communication. D-Lib Magazine, Vol. 8, no.11.

http://www.dlib.org/dlib/november02/11contents.html.

Kim, J. 2005. Finding documents in a Digital Institutional Repository: DSpace and Eprints. In 68th Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science and Technology (ASIST), Charlotte (US), 28 October - 2 November 2005.

Kim, J. 2006. Motivating and impeding factors affecting faculty contribution to Institutional Repositories. In Proc. Joint Conference on Digital Libraries. Chapel Hill, NC, USA: ACM Press

Lynch, C.A. 2003. Institutional repositories: Essential infrastructure for scholarship in the digital age. ARL Bimonthly Report, no. 226, 1-7. Available at :http://www.arl.org/resources/pubs/br/br226/br226ir.shtm.

McKay, D. 2007. Institutional Repositories and their 'other' users: Usability beyond authors. Ariadne, 52(July). Available at : http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue52/mckay/.

MyUniNet. (http://portal.perpun.net.my/portal/index.php)

Nicholas, D., Huntington, P., Jamali, Hamid. 2007. The impact of open access publishing (and other access initiatives) on use and users of digital scholarly journals. Learned Publishing, Vol.20, no. 1: 11-15.

Pelizzari, E. 2005. Harvesting for disseminating: open archives and the role of academic libraries. The Acquisitions Librarian, Vol.33, no. 34: 35-51.

Registry of Open Access Repositories (ROAR, http://roar.eprints.org/)

Shearer, M. K. 2003. Institutional Repositories: towards the identification of critical success factors. Canadian Journal of Information and Library Science, Vol. 27, no. 3:89-108.

Tonta, Y. 2008. Open Access and Institutional Repositories: The Turkish Landscape. In: Turkish Libraries in Transition: New Opportunities and Challenges. Turkish Librarians' Association.

Whitehead, D. 2005. Repositories: What's the target? An ARROW Perspective". In Proc. International Association of Technological University Libraries Conference. Quebec City, Canada: IATUL.

Woodland, J. and Ng, J. 2006. Too many systems, too little time :Integrating an ePrint repository into a University publications system, VALA 2006 13th Biennial Conference and Exhibition, 8 - 10 February 2006. Crown Towers Melbourne, Australia: Victorian Association for Library Automation

Zainab A.N. 2006. Scholarly Skywriting: E-Print Archives And E-Journals, Panacea Or Problem? Inaugural Lecture. University Malaya.

Zuber, P.A. 2008. A study of institutional repository holdings by academic discipline. D-Lib Magazine, Vol. 14, no. 11/12. Available at: http://www.dlib.org/dlib/november08/11contents.html.

Repository Staff Only: item control page