Author, Subjects, Keywords

Cited Author

 

 
   » By Author or Editor
 » Browse Author by Alphabet
 » By Journal
 » By Subjects
 » Malaysian Journals
 » By Type
 » By Year
 » By Latest Additions
 
 
   » By Author
 » Top 20 Authors
 » Top 20 Article
 » Top Journal Cited
 » Top Article Cited
 » Journal Citation Statistics
 » Usage Since Sept 2007


 
 
 

Login | Create Account

Origins of Tissue Engineering

Rani Samsudin, (2001) Origins of Tissue Engineering. Malaysian Journal of Medical Sciences, 8 (2). pp. 7-8. ISSN 1394195X

Full text not available from this repository.

Official URL: http://www.medic.usm.my/publication/mjms/

Affiliations

Tissue Bank Unit, School of Medical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia

Abstract

Tissue engineering conceptually partners engineering with the life sciences to provide living substitutes for medical and biologic applications. As we begin tracking the origins of tissue engineering, what stands out from the past and remains with us in the present, is the role played by surgeons in creating one body part for another to meet the needs of individual patients. Improvising anatomic repair using an individul’s own organ or tissue is still a technique often used by the reconstructive surgeon. For example consider the dental surgeon’s common
practice of using a segment of a rib to reconstruct part of the jaw which have been resected due to cancer. The autotransplanted rib will support the function of mastication, deglution, speech as well as growth and development of the young jaw. The procedure has been remarkably successful, but in the new age of tissue engineering our thinking is directed to the fabrication of a substitute jaw constituting bone and cartilage that the surgeon can take off the shelf. It was in the tradition of innovative surgical borrowing to rebuild a body part that new materials were sought to substitute for what the patient’s own tissue might provide. The idea of improving on nature by using man made materials was nurtured by the discovery and availability of the new synthetics during World War II (1). Since that time of technological expansion the quest for substitutes for autologous tissues has decline but the synthetic replacements very rarely or almost never matches the quality of an autograft. Thermoplastic synthetic polymers such as nylon, dacron, polyurethane, polypropylene and many other industrial materials not designed for use in the human body as tissue replacement, were introduced by suppliers of surgical armementarium and were used by practitioners of the art of surgery for rebuilding damaged, diseased, aged or genetically deficient body parts. The synthetic materials were introduced into the human body as components of fabricated replacement parts at a time when possibility of
reconstituting biologic substitutes was still unexplored. Many of the postwar synthetics are still in use today with major questions regarding their efficacy hanging over us.
Traditional Tissue Banking played a significant role in the development of present day multidisciplinary reconstructive science. Procurement, processing, packaging, sterilising and distribution of the final ‘non-living’ tissue graft product has always been regarded as the state of the art surgical craft. Nevertheless all tissue bank scientists agree that the replacement of the lost tissues using viable cells are superior to the utilization of processed tissue grafts even with the addition of growth factors.

Item Type:Journal
Keywords:Tissue, engineering, graft
Subjects:R Medicine
ID Code:953

1. Robert P. Lanza. Principles of Tissue Engineering, 2nd. Edition, Academic Press 2000; 3-15.

2. Boyan BD, Lohmann CH, Romero J, Schwart Z, Bone and cartilage tissue engineering. Clini. Plas. Surg. 1999; 26: 629-645.

3. Salyapongse AN, Billiar TR, Edington H, Gene therapy and tissue engineering. Clini. Plas. Surg. 1999; 26: 663-

676.

4. Russell AJ, Farkas DL, Huard J, Rubin RT, The Pittsburgh tissue engineering initiative. Clini. Plas. Surg. 1999; 26: 529-535.

Repository Staff Only: item control page