Author, Subjects, Keywords

Cited Author

 
 
   » By Author or Editor
 » Browse Author by Alphabet
 » By Journal
 » By Subjects
 » Malaysian Journals
 » By Type
 » By Year
 » By Latest Additions
 
 
   » By Author
 » Top 20 Authors
 » Top 20 Article
 » Top Journal Cited
 » Top Article Cited
 » Journal Citation Statistics
 » Usage Since Sept 2007


 
 
 

Login | Create Account

Penyelidikan Lakuan Bahasa: Pemilihan Kaedah dan Pola Penemuan

Maros, Marlyna, (2007) Penyelidikan Lakuan Bahasa: Pemilihan Kaedah dan Pola Penemuan. Akademika, 71 (Julai) . pp. 91-115. ISSN 01265008

[img]PDF (Article) - Registered users only until 31 December 2015 - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
130Kb

Official URL: http://pkukmweb.ukm.my/~penerbit/akademika/jademik.html

Affiliations

Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia. Faculty of Social Science and Humanities. School of Language and Linguistics Studies

Abstract

ABSTRACT:This paper compares the methods commonly used in speech acts research, among which are discourse completion tasks, role playing, and participation and nonparticipation observation. Several examples based on these methods are presented, along with findings, strengths and constraints. More specifically this article focuses on complaints within a Malay language community and highlights how the choice of methods influences data type and potential findings. The study shows that using participant and non-participant observation reveal more than the usual linguistic features of complaint such as the components that made up the set of complaint and the severity of complaint. The data from this study give the ociolinguistic pattern of complaint, namely codeswitching and social strategies of the speech act. Some examples of types of codeswitching and social strategies are included in the discussion. To conclude, the discussion in this article contributes to the sociolinguistics field, specifically the understanding of Malay sociolinguistics.

ABSTRAK: Makalah ini membandingkan beberapa kaedah yang lazim digunakan dalam penyelidikan lakuan bahasa. Antara kaedah yang dimaksudkan ialah tugas penyempurnaan wacana, lakonan, dan pemerhatian serta pemerhatian ikut serta. Beberapa contoh kajian berdasarkan kaedah tersebut turut dikemukakan, selain dapatan, kekuatan dan kekangan. Secara lebih khusus, makalah ini tertumpu kepada penyelidikan lakuan bahasa komplin dalam komuniti bahasa Melayu dan memperlihatkan bagaimana pemilihan kaedah tertentu dapat mempengaruhi jenis (bentuk) data dan dapatan yang bakal diperolehi. Hasil kajian menunjukkan bahawa pemilihan kaedah pemerhatian serta pemerhatian ikut serta dalam kajian lakuan bahasa komplin dapat membantu pemahaman perlakuan komplin dalam komuniti bahasa Melayu daripada konteks interaksi sosial. Perbincangan dalam makalah ini diharap dapat menyumbang dan memantapkan ilmu sosiolinguistik amnya, dan sosiolinguistik Bahasa Melayu khususnya.

Item Type:Journal
Keywords:lakuan bahasa, komuniti bahasa Melayu, sosiolinguistik Melayu, peralihan kod; speech acts, Malay language community, Malay sociolinguistics, code switching
Subjects:H Social Sciences, Economics, Sociology
P Language and Literature
L Education
ID Code:9659

Asma Abdullah. 1996. Going Glocal: Cultural Dimensions in Malaysian Management.Kuala Lumpur: Malaysian Institute of Management.

Asmah Haji Omar. 1992. The Linguistic Scenery in Malaysia. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.

Bardovi-Harlig, K., & Hartford, B.S. 1991. Saying “no” in English: Native and Nonnative Rejections. Dlm. Fine, J. (pnyt.), Second Language Discourse: A Textbook of Current Research. Norwood, NJ: Ablex 2:41-57.

Beebe, L. & Cummings, M.C. 1996. Natural Speech Act Data Versus Written Questionnaire Data: How Data Collection Method Affects Speech Act Performance. Dlm. Gass, S. dan Neu, J. (pnyt.). Speech Acts Across Cultures: Challenges

to Communication in a Second Language. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

Beebe, L.M., Takahashi, T., and Uliss-Weltz, R. 1990. Pragmatic Transfer in ESL Refusals. Dlm. Scarcella, R.C., Anderson, E., & Kashen, S.D. (pnyt.). Developing Communicative Competence in a Second Language. New York: Newbury House.

Beebe, L. dan Takahashi, T. 1989a. “Do You Have a Bag?” Sosial Status and Patterned Variation in Second Language Acquisition. Dlm Gass S., Madden, C., Preston, D. dan Selinker, L. (pnyt.) 103-105.

Beebe, L. dan Takahashi, T. 1989b. “Sociolinguistic variation in face-threatening speech acts”, dalam Eisenstein, M. (peny.) 199-218.

Blum-Kulka, House dan Kasper (peny.). 1989. Cross-Cultural Pragmatics: Requests and Apologies. Norwood, NJ:Ablex.

Bodman, J. & Eisenstein, M. 1988. May God increase your bounty: The expression of gratitutde in English by native and non-native speakers. Cross Currents 15:1-21.

Bonikowska, M. 1988. The Choice of Opting Out, Applied Linguistics 9(2):169-181.

Boxer, D. 1993. Complaining and commiserating: A speech act view of solidarity in spoken American English. New York: Peter Lang.

Brown, D. & Levinson, P. 1987. Politeness: some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Cohen, A. 1996a. Investigating the production of speech act sets. Dlm. Gass & New (pnyt.), Speech Acts Across Cultures: Challenges to Communication in a Second Language, 21-44. Berlin&New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

Cohen, A. 1996b. Speech Acts. Dlm. McKay S. dan N. Hornberger (pnyt.)Sociolinguistics and Language Teaching, 383-420. Cambidge: Cambridge University Press.

Cohen, A & Olshtain, E. 1993. The Production of Speech Acts by EFL Learners, TESOL Quarterly 27:33-56.

Creese, A. 1991. Speech act variation in British and American English, Penn Working Papers in Educational Linguistics 7(2):37-58

Daikuhara, M. 1986. A Study of Compliments from a Cross-Cultural Perspective: Japanese vs. American English, Penn Working Papers in Educational Linguistics

2:(2):23-41.

DeCapua, Andrea. 1998. The Transfer of Language Speech Behavior into a Second Language: A Basis for Cultural Stereotypes? Issues in Applied Linguistics

9(1):21-36.

D’Amico-Reisner, L. 1985. An ethnolinguistic study of disapproval exchanges. Tesis Ph.D. tidak diterbitkan. University of Pennsylvania.

Eisenstein, M., Bodman, J., dan Carpenter, M. (1996). “Cross-Cultural Realization of Greetings in American English”, in Gass, S. dan Neu, J. (eds.), Speech Acts Across Cultures: Challenges to Communication in a Second Language, 89-108. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

Faerch, C. and Kasper, G. 1989. Internal and external modification in interlanguage request realization. Dlm. Blum-Kulka, S., House, J., dan Kasper G. (pnyt.),

Cross-Cultural pragmatics: requests and apologies, 221-247. Norwood,N.J: Ablex.

Fescura, 1993. A Sociolinguistic comparison of “reactions to complaints”: Italian L1 vs. English L1, Italian L2, and Italian as a community language. Tesis. Toronto: University of Toronto, Graduate Department of Education.

Hatch, E. 1992. Discourse and Language Education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Holmes, J. 1989. Women’s and men’s apologies: Reflectors of cultural values, Applied Linguistics 10(2):194-213.

House, J & Kasper, G. 1981. Politeness Markers in English and German. Dlm. Coulmas (peny.), Conversational Routine, 157-185. The Hague: Mouton.

Hymes, D. 1972a. Editorial introduction. Language in Society 1:1-14.

Hymes, D. 1972b. Models of the interactions of language and social life. Dlm. Gumperz J., and D. Hymes (pnyt.). Directions in Sociolinguistics, hlm. 35-71. New York:

Holt, Rinehart&Winston.

Jamaliah Mohd. Ali. 2002. Why we don’t say what we mean: A study of verbal indirection in communication. Jurnal Bahasa Moden 14:33-44.

Kasper, G. & Dahl, M. 1991. Research Methods in Interlanguage Pragmatics, Studies in Second Language Acquisition 13:215-247.

Keating, E. 2001. The Etnography of Communication. Dlm. Atkinson, Coffey, Delamont, Lofland and Lofland (pnyt.). Handbook of Ethnography, hlm. 285-301. London:

Sage Publications.

Nash, T. 1983. An instance of American and Chinese Politeness Strategy. RELC Journal 14(2):287-98.

Olshtain, E. and Blum-Kulka S. 1985. Cross-cultural pragmatics and the testing of Communicative competence. Language Testing 2:16-30.

Olshtain, E. dan Cohen, A. 1983. Apology: A Speech Act Set. Dlm. Wolfson dan Judd (pnyt.), Sociolinguistics and Language Acquisition. Rowley, MA: Newbury House

Publication.

Olshtain, E. & Weinbach, L. 1987. Complaints: A study of speech act behavior among native and non-native speakers of Hebrew. Dlm. Jef Verschrueren dan Marcella

Bertuccelli-Papi (pnyt.), The Pragmatic Perspective: Selected Papers from the 1985 International Pragmatics Conference, 195-208. Amsterdam:Benjamins.

Olshtain, E. and Weinbach, L. 1993. Interlanguage Features of the Speech Act of Complaining. Dlm. Kasper, G. and Blum-Kulka, S. (pnyt.). Interlanguage Pragmatics. New York: Oxford University Press.

Piotrowska, M. 1987. An investigation into the Sociolinguistic competence of Hong Kong University students with specific reference to “making complaints”. Manuskrip tak diterbitkan. Hong Kong: University of Hong Kong, Language Center.

Quellette, M.A. 2001. “That’s too bad”:Hedges and Indirect Complaints in ‘troublestalk’ Narrative. Working Papers in Educational Linguistics 19:107-122.

Rintell, E. dan Mitchell, C. 1989. Studying Requests and Apologies: An Inquiry into Method. Dlm Blum-Kulka, S.J. House and Kasper, G. pnyt.), Cross-Cultural Pragmatics:Requests and Apologies, 248-272. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

Rose, K. 2000. An Exploratory Cross-Sectional Study of Interlanguage Pragmatic Development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 22(1):27-67.

Sasaki, M. 1998. Investigating EFL Students’ Production of Speech Acts: A Comparison of production Questionnaires and Role Plays. Journal of Pragmatics 30:457-484.

Schaefer, E. J. 1982. An Analysis of the Discourse and Syntax of Oral Complaints in English. Tesis MA. Los Angeles: ESL Section, Department of English, University

of California.

Searle, J. R. 1979. Speech Acts: An essay in the Philosophy of Language. New York:Cambridge University Press.

Sharrock, W.W. & Turner, R. 1978. On a Conversational Environment for Equivocality. Dlm. Schenkein, J. (pnyt). Studies in the Organization of Conversational Interaction.

New York: Academic Press.

Tanaka, S. & Kawade, S. 1982. Politeness Strategies and Second Language Acquisition, Studies in Second Language Acquisition 5(1):18-33.

Teo Kok Seong. 2001. Saying It Right. Education, New Straits Times, May 29:15.

Teo Kok Seong. 1995. Tahu Bahasa/Tak Tahu Bahasa: Persoalan Bahasa, Budaya dan Komunikasi. Dlm Hanapi Dollah dan Lokman Mohd. Zen (pnyt.), Kebudayaan Melayu di Ambang Abad Baru: Satu Himpunan Makalah, 273-288. Bangi: Jabatan

Persuratan Melayu.

Tickle, A. L. 1991. Japanese Refusals in a Business Setting. Papers in Applied Linguistics-

Michigan 6(2):84-108.

Trosborg, A. 1994. Interlanguage Pragmatics: Requests, Complaints and Apologies. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

Wilce, James, M. 1998. Eloquence in Trouble: The Poetics and Politics of Complaint in Rural Bangladesh. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Wolfson, N. 1989. Perspectives: Sociolinguistics and TESOL. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.

Wolfson, N. 1988. The bulge: A theory of speech behavior and social distance. Dalam Fine, J. (pnyt.), Second Language Discourse: A Textbook of Current Research. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

Wolfson, N. and Judd, E. (pnyt.). 1983. Sociolinguistics and language acquisition.Rowley, MA: Newbury House.

Wolfson, N. & Manes, J. 1980. The Compliment as a Social Strategy. Papers in Linguistics 13(3):391-410.

Zhang, De. 2002. The Speech Act of Complaining: A Cross-Cultural Comparative Study of Chinese and American English Speakers. Tesis MA, Iowa State University.

Repository Staff Only: item control page
 
 
 
 
 
 
© Copyright 2007 MyAIS Faculty of Computer Science and Information Technology, University of Malaya – All Rights Reserved. Malaysian Abstracting and Indexing System is powered by EPrints 3 which is developed by the School of Electronics and Computer Science at the University of Southampton. More information and software credits.