Author, Subjects, Keywords

Cited Author

 
 
   » By Author or Editor
 » Browse Author by Alphabet
 » By Journal
 » By Subjects
 » Malaysian Journals
 » By Type
 » By Year
 » By Latest Additions
 
 
   » By Author
 » Top 20 Authors
 » Top 20 Article
 » Top Journal Cited
 » Top Article Cited
 » Journal Citation Statistics
 » Usage Since Sept 2007


 
 
 

Login | Create Account

Learner autonomy among Malaysian adult learners through asynchronous online discussions

Sidhu, Ranjit Kaur, and Mohamed Amin bin Embi, (2009) Learner autonomy among Malaysian adult learners through asynchronous online discussions. Asean Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 1 (2). pp. 30-41. ISSN ISSN :1985-5826

[img]
Preview
PDF - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
84Kb

Official URL: http://pkukmweb.ukm.my/jtlhe/

Affiliations

Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia
Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia

Abstract

The use of computer-mediated communication (CMC) in course offerings in institutions of higher learning (IHLs) is seen as the catalyst towards producing autonomous lifelong learners. This paper explores Malaysian adult learners’ views of participating in asynchronous online discussions,
one mode of asynchronous computer-mediated communication (ACMC), in a private university in Malaysia as a means of aiding them to become autonomous learners in the areas of planning, monitoring and decision making. The sample population comprised sixteen third-year adult course respondents (n=16) enrolled in the Listening and Speaking Course (LSC) for their Bachelor in Education (TESL) degree program. The sample comprised six (n=6) case respondents and one tutor (n=1). This descriptive case study employed a mixed method approach. Quantitative data were collected through a survey questionnaire, whereas qualitative data were obtained by analysing threaded asynchronous online interactions (AOI), conducting semi-structured interviews and analysing case respondents’ learning logs. The Þndings revealed that generally course respondents rated their abilities in planning, monitoring and decision making as average. In-depth analysis of six case respondents’ abilities also showed average abilities (overall average score = 3.3) in all three aspects of learner autonomy. This study has shown that online discussions have the potential in aiding learners in taking charge of their own learning, thus paving the way for learner autonomy. These Þndings augur well for local and global IHLs as ACMC is seen as the next e-wave of the future. However, for students to benefit from quality asynchronous online discussions, it must be accompanied by an effective follow-up system backed by dedicated educators.

Item Type:Journal
Keywords:Learner autonomy, computer mediated communication, asynchronous computer mediated communication, asynchronous online discussions/interactions, Virtual Learning System, adult learning.
Subjects:L Education
ID Code:9926

Barron, A. & Orwig, G. 1993. New technologies for education. Englewood, CO: Libraries Unlimited.

Benson, P. 2001. Teaching and researching autonomy in language learning. London: Longman.

Berge, Z.L., & Collins, M.P. 1995. Computer mediated communication and the online classroom: Overview and Perspectives. Cresskill, New Jersey: Hampton Press, Inc.

Berge, Z. & Myers, B. 2000. Evaluating computer mediated communication courses in higher education. Journal of Educational Computing Research. Vol. 23, No. 4, pp. 431-450.

Bonk, C.J. 2004. The perfect e-storm emerging technology, enormous learner demand, enhanced pedagogy, and erased budgets. The Observatory on Borderless Higher Education.

Part 1 - Storm No. 1 and No. 2.

Dickinson, L. 1995. Autonomy and motivation: A literature review. System 23(2): 165-174.

Farmer, R. & Sweeney, E. 1994. Self-access in Hong Kong: A square peg in a round hole? Occasional papers in Language Teaching 4 (ELT Unit: Chinese University of Hong Kong): 24-30.

Feden, P.D. & Vogel, R.M. 2003. Methods of teaching: applying cognitive science to promote student learning. New York: McGraw-Hill Higher Education.

Gunawardena, C.N. 1995. Social presence theory and implications for interaction and collaborative learning in computer conferences. International Journal of Educational Telecommunications 1: 147-166.

Gurnam Kaur. 2000. Investigating learner autonomy through strategy training in the ESL classroom. PhD thesis. University Malaya, Kuala Lumpur.

Harasim, L. 2000. Shift happens online education as a new paradigm in learning. The Internet and Higher Education. Vol 3, pp. 41-61

Hiemstra, R. 1994. Computerized Distance education: the role of facilitators. MPAEA Journal of Adult Education 22(2): 11-23.

Hirsch, E.D., Jr. 1998. Reality’s revenge: Research and ideology (excerpt from “The schools we need and why we don’t have them”. Arts Education Policy Review. (3/1/19980 High Beam Research (6 March 2005).

Holec, H. 1981. Autonomy and foreign language learning. Oxford: Pergamon.

Jonassen, D.H., Peck, K.L. & Wilson, B.G. 1999. Learning with technology: A constructivist perspective. Upper Saddle River, NJ Merill: Prentice Hall.

Jonassen, D.H. 2000. 2nd ed. Computers as mindtools for schools. Prentice-Hall, Inc. NJ:USA.

Klopfenstein, B.J. 2003. Empowering learners: Strategies for fostering self-directed learning and implications for online learning. Unpublished Master of Education thesis, University of Alberta.

Knapper, C. 1998. 2nd ed. Technology and lifelong learning. In D. Boud (ed.) Developing student autonomy in learning. pp 91-106. London: Kogan Page.

Levy, M. 1997. Computer-assisted language learning: context and conceptualization. New York: Oxford University Press.

Little, D. 1991. Learner autonomy and self-directed learning: present fi elds of application. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.

McAnear, A. 2002. Strategies for expanding technology’s role. Learning and Leading with Technology 30(3): 4-13.

McGarry, D. 1995. Learner autonomy 1: defi nitions, issues and problems. Dublin: Authentik.

Merriam, S.B. 2002. Qualitative research in practice: examples for discussion and analysis. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Moore, M.G. 1980. Independent study. In Boyd, R. & J. Apps. (eds). Redefi ning the discipline of adult education. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.

Nunan, D. 1997. Designing and adapting materials to encourage learner autonomy. In Benson, Phil & Voller, Peter (eds.). 1997. Autonomy and independence in language learning. London: Longman: 192-203.

Palloff, R. & Pratt, K. 1999. Building learning communities in cyberspace: effective strategies for the online classroom. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Ranjit Kaur. & Mohamed Amin Embi. 2007. Learner autonomy through computer mediated communication (CMC). Jurnal Teknologi 46(E):105-118. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.

Santoro, G.M. 1990. What is the online classroom?

In Z.L. Berge & M.P. Collins, (eds.). Wired together: The online classroom in K-12,1. Cresskill, New Jersey: Hampton Press.

Schramber, L. 1988. Delivery systems for distance education. (ERIC Document Reproduction

Service No. ED 304 111).

Selwyn, N. 2000. Creating a “Connected” Community? eachers’ Use of an Electronic Discussion Group. Teachers’ College Record. Vol. 102, No. 4, pp. 750-778.

Sheerin, S. 1997. An exploration of the relationship

between self-access and independent learning. In Benson, Phil & Voller, Peter (eds.). 1997. Autonomy and independence in language learning. London: Longman: 54-65.

Swan, K. 2001. Building learning communities in online courses: the importance of interaction. Distance Education 22(2): 306-331.

Wolters, C.A., Pintrich, P.R. & Karabenick, S.A. 2003. March. Assessing academic self-regulated learning. Paper presented at the Conference on Indicators of positive development: Defi nitions, measures, and prospective validity, Washinton, DC.

Yumuk, A. 2002. Letting go of control to the learners. The role of the Internet in promoting a more autonomous view of learning in an academic translation course. Educational

Research. 44 (2):141-156.

Ziguras, C. 2001. Educational technology in transnational

higher education in South East Asia: the cultural politics of fl exible learning. Educational Technology & Science. 4 (4): 1-15. ISSN 1436-4522.

Repository Staff Only: item control page
 
 
 
 
 
 
© Copyright 2007 MyAIS Faculty of Computer Science and Information Technology, University of Malaya – All Rights Reserved. Malaysian Abstracting and Indexing System is powered by EPrints 3 which is developed by the School of Electronics and Computer Science at the University of Southampton. More information and software credits.