Author, Subjects, Keywords

Cited Author

 
 
   » By Author or Editor
 » Browse Author by Alphabet
 » By Journal
 » By Subjects
 » Malaysian Journals
 » By Type
 » By Year
 » By Latest Additions
 
 
   » By Author
 » Top 20 Authors
 » Top 20 Article
 » Top Journal Cited
 » Top Article Cited
 » Journal Citation Statistics
 » Usage Since Sept 2007


 
 
 

Login | Create Account

Kriteria Pemilihan Kakitangan Akademik IPTS Menggunakan Teknik Sentroid Tertib

Ahmad Mahir Razali, and Ang, Chiu Woon, (2007) Kriteria Pemilihan Kakitangan Akademik IPTS Menggunakan Teknik Sentroid Tertib. Journal of Quality Measurement and Analysis (JQMA), 3 (1). pp. 1-8. ISSN 1823-5670

[img]
Preview
PDF - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
19Kb

Official URL: http://pkukmweb.ukm.my/~ppsmfst/jqma/V3_1/JQMA-3-1-01-abstractrefs.pdf

Affiliations

Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Faculty of Science and Technology, School of Mathematical Sciences
Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Faculty of Science and Technology, School of Mathematical Sciences

Abstract

Kajian ini dijalankan adalah untuk menentukan kepentingan setiap kriteria dan subkriteria yang dipertimbangkan semasa pemilihan kakitangan akademik.Kajian ini merupakan satu
kajian kes di UNITEN,sebuah IPTS bertaraf universiti yang telah dijalankan dari bulan April hingga Jun 2005.Temubual dijalankan dengan Pengurus Sumber Manusia untuk meneliti
prosedur pemilihan kakitangan akademik di UNITEN. Borang soal selidik diedarkan kepada setiap pembuat keputusan dalam hal pemilihan kakitangan akademik, iaitu Dekan, Timbalan Dekan, Ketua Jabatan dan Pengurus Sumber Manusia di UNITEN. Skala pemangkatan digunakan untuk menyusun kepentingan kriteria dan subkriteria di mana nilai pemberat dikira menggunakan teknik sentroid tertib pangkat. Hasil kajian mendapati bahawa kriteria kelayakan akademik mempunyai pemberat yang paling tinggi, iaitu 0.4207,diikuti oleh pengalaman bekerja (0.2039), kebolehan mengajar (0.2030), aktiviti penyelidikan (0.1108) dan akhir sekali personaliti (0.0618). Kesimpulannya, maklumat kuantitatif ini boleh digunakan sebagai rujukan oleh pihak pembuat keputusan ataupun boleh diaplikasikan dalam proses pemilihan kakitangan akademik.

[This study was carried out to determine the importance of each criterion and sub criteria that are considered during academic staff selection. This is a case study which was carried out from April to June 2005 at UNITEN, a private institution of higher education with university status. Interview was conducted with the human resource manager to find out about their academic staff selection procedure. Questionnaire was distributed to every decision maker(Dean, Deputy Dean,Head of Department)in academic staff selection. Ranking scale was used to rank the importance of the criteria and sub criteria. Then, weight value for each criterion and sub criteria was calculated using the rank order centroid technique. Analysis shows that academic qualification criterion has the highest weight (0.4207), followed by work experience (0.2039), teaching ability (0.2030), research activity (0.1108) and lastly personality (0.0618). In conclusion, decision makers can use these findings as additional information to be applied in the decision making process regarding selection of the academic
staff.]

Item Type:Journal
Keywords:pembuatan keputusan; kriteria pemilihan; sentroid tertib pangkat. [decision making; selection criteria; rank order centroid.]
Subjects:H Social Sciences, Economics, Sociology
Q Science, Computer Science
ID Code:9983

Barron F.H. & Barrett B.E. 1996. Decision quality using ranked attribute weights. Management Science 42(11):1515-1523.

Beynon M.J. 2005. A method of aggregation in DS/AHP for group decision making with non equivalent importance of individuals in the group. Computer & Operations Research 32: 1881-1896.

Erwina Bakarrudin. 2005. Pembuatan Keputusan Multi Kriteria bagi Penjawatan Kakitangan Akademik di Institusi Pengajian Tinggi Awam. Tesis Sarjana. Bangi: Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.

Hsieh T.Y., Lu S.T. & Tzeng G.H. 2004. Fuzzy MCDM approach for planning and design tenders selection in public office buildings. International Journal of Project Management 22: 573-584.

Ivancevich J.M. 2001. Human Resource Management. 8th Ed. New York: McGraw-Hill Companies.

Jefferies A. & Jones I. 2002. A review of the institutional impact of recently appointed teaching fellows. Educational Development 3(1): 8-9.

Jia J., Fischer G.W. & Dyer J.S. 1998. Attribute weighting methods and decision quality in the presence of response error: a simulation study. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 11(2): 85-105.

Joseph M. & Joseph B. 1997. Service quality in education: a student perspective. Quality Assurance in Education 5(1): 15-21.

Kementerian Pendidikan Tinggi Malaysia. 2002. Jabatan Pendidikan Swasta. http://www.jps.moe.gov.my(20 Julai 2005).

Kirkwood C.W. & Sarin R.K. 1985. Ranking with partial information: a method and an application.Operation Research 33: 38-48.

Koster B., Brekelmans M., Korthagen F. & Wubbles T. 2005. Quality requirements for teacher educators. Teaching and Teacher Education 21: 157-176.

Lam K. & Zhao X. 1998. An application of quality function deployment to improve the quality of teaching.International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management 15(4): 189-413.

Lomas L. 2004. Embedding quality: the challenges for higher education. Quality Assurance in Education 12(4): 157-165.

M. Sadiq Sohail, Jegatheesan Rajadurai & Nor Azlin Abdul Rahman. 2003. Managing quality in higher education: a Malaysian case study. The International Journal of Educational Management 17(4): 141-146.

Mustafa A. & Goh M. 1996. Multi-criterion models for higher education administration. International Journal of Management Science 24(2): 167-178.

Owlia M.S. & Aspinwall E.M. 1996. A framework for the dimensions of quality in higher education.Quality Assurance in Education 4(2): 12-20.

Patterson P., Ramm T. & Hill C. 1998.Consumer satisfaction as a process:a qualitative,retrospective longitudinal study of overseas students in Australia. Journal of Professional Services Marketing 16(1): 135-157.

Srikatanyoo N. & Gnoth J. 2005.Quality dimensions in international tertiary education:a Thai prospective students’ perspective. The Quality Management Journal 12(1): 30-40.

Repository Staff Only: item control page
 
 
 
 
 
 
© Copyright 2007 MyAIS Faculty of Computer Science and Information Technology, University of Malaya – All Rights Reserved. Malaysian Abstracting and Indexing System is powered by EPrints 3 which is developed by the School of Electronics and Computer Science at the University of Southampton. More information and software credits.