1670 12 archive 2 disk0/00/00/16/70 2008-02-09 18:35:25 2008-02-09 18:35:25 2008-02-09 18:35:25 article show Ramesh, S. Sidhu, S. Manjit Watugala, G.K. University Tenaga Nasional. Department of Mechanical Engineering University Tenaga Nasional. College of Information Technology University of Moratuwa, Sri Lanka pub Q T L none The use of multiple choice tests as a tool of assessment are popular in many university courses, particularly in the foundation year where there is large number of students taking common subjects such as mathematics or engineering science. Under such circumstances, the answers to the multiple choice questions (MCQs) are written on special forms with blank ovals. These forms are scanned and marking is done by comparing the answers with those inputs by the examiner. Subsequently, the results of the students are tabulated with the aid of customised software. However, this conventional method of administering MCQs is not practicable when the number of students and the number of questions are small e.g. ≤ 100 and ≤ 10, respectively. The present paper addresses this issue and discusses the development of an unconventional, yet an effective method for administering short and simple MCQs as a means of assessing student learning in a focus area of the subject matter. A MCQs test was designed, wherein the five choices (n = 5) of answer to a question is tagged with different numerical numbers based on the multiplication of numeral (n + 1) and not by the alphabets A, B, C, D and E as per normal practice. At the end of the test, the candidate will total the selected choices for questions and the test result can then be obtained by inputting the total choice value in a simple spreadsheet programme. The spreadsheet programmme was written specifically to decode that number and indicate the number of correct answers. 2005 published Malaysian Online Journal of Instructional Technology (MOJIT) 2 1 Malaysian Educational Technology Association 15p. TRUE 1823-1144 http://pppjj.usm.my/mojit/articles/pdf/April05/04-Ramesh&Manjit.pdf Appleby, J., Samuels, P. & Treasure-Jones, T. (1997). A knowledge-based diagnostic test of basic mathematical skills. Computer & Education Journal, 28 (2), 113-131. Atkins, M.J. (1993). Evaluating interactive technologies for learning. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 25, 333-342. Callear, D. & King, T. (1997). Using computer-based test for information science. Alt-J., 5 (1), 27-32. Carneson, J., Delpierre, G. & Masters, K. (2003). Designing and Managing Multiple Choice Questions. Australia: Southrock Corporation Ltd. Cassels, J.R.T. & Johnstone, A.H. (1984). The effect of language on student performance on multiple choice tests in chemistry. Journal of Chemistry Education, 61, 613-615. Clegg, V.L. & Cashin, W.E. (1986). Improving multiple-choice tests. Idea Paper No. 16, Center for Faculty Evaluation and Development, Kansas State University. Fox, J.S. (1983). The multiple choice tutorials: its use in the reinforcement of fundamentals in medical education. Medical Education, 17 (2), 90-94. Fuhrman, M. (1996). Developing good multiple-choice tests and test questions. Journal of Geoscience Education, 44, 379-384. Gronlund, N.E. (1988). How to Construct Achievement Tests. Englewood Cliffs, N.J: Prentice-Hall. Harper, R. (2003). Multiple-choice questions – A reprieve. BEE-j, 2, 2-6. Hosie, P. & Mazzarol, T. (1999). Using technology for the competitive delivery of education services. Journal pf Computer Assisted Learning, 15, 118-128. Kelly, A., Maunder, S. & Cheng, S. (1996). Does practice make perfect? Using TRANSMATH to assess mathematics coursework. Active Learning, 4, 30-36. Laurillard, D. (1993). Rethinking University Teaching: A Framework for the Effective Use of Educational Technology. London: Routledge. Morgan, C. & O'Reilly, M. (1999). Assessing Open and Distance Learners. London: Routledge Falmer. Pritchett, N. (1999). Effective question design. In S. Brown, J. Bull & P. Race. (Eds.). Computer-Assisted Assessment in Higher Education. London: Kogan Page, pp. 29-37. Ricketts, C. & Wilks, S.J. (2002). Improving student performance through computer-based assessment: insights from recent research. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 27 (5), 475-479. Russell, M., Fischer, M.J., Fischer, C.M. & Premo, K. (2003). Exam question sequencing effects on marketing and management sciences student performance. Journal of Advancement of Marketing Education., 3, 1-10. Sevenair, J.P. & Burkett, A.R. (1988). Difficulty and discrimination of multiple choice questions: A counterintuitive result. Journal of Chemistry Education, 61, 441-442. Skinner, B. F. (1968). The Technology of Teaching. New York: Appleton-Century Croft. Thelwall, M. (1998). A unique style of computer assisted assessment. Alt-J., 6 (2), 49-57. Thelwall, M. (2000). Computer-based assessment: a versatile educational tool. Computer & Education. Journal, 34, 37-49. Thoennessen, M. & Harrison, M.J. (1996). Computer-Assisted Assignments in a Large Physics Class. Computer & Education Journal, 27 (2), 141. Welsh, A.L. (1978). Multiple choice objective tests. In P. Saunders, A.L. Welsh & W.L. Hansen. (Eds.). Resource Manual for Teacher Training Programs in Economics. New York: Joint Council on Economic Education, pp. 191-228. Whiting, J. (1985). The use of computer tutorial as a replacement for human tuition in a mastery learning strategy. Computer & Education Journal, 9 (2), 101-109. Williams, P. (2002). The learning web: the development, implementation and evaluation of internet-based undergraduate materials for the teaching of key skills. Active Learning in Higher Education, 3, 40-53. Wood, E.J. (2003). What are extended matching sets questions? BEE-j, 1 (1), 1-2. Worthen, B.R. & Sanders, J.R. (1987). Educational Evaluation: Alternative Approaches and Practical Guidelines. New York: Longman. Zakrzewski, S. & Bull, J. (1998). The mass implementation and evaluation of computer-based assessments. Assessments & Evaluation in Higher Education, 23 (2), 141-152.